Working for New Science -
Shad's Thoughts about
Prof. Sapogin's Article
Hi Juha,
Thanks for your reply and the forward of
Prof. Sapogin's
answer! Very interesting!
Let me add some comments.
I read his text document "New
Sources
of Energy from the Point of View of Unitary
Quantum Theory" with admiration! He is not
standing alone with his opinion, there are some
theories with similar meanings. One for example is the
so-called 'string theory' you probably have already
heard of. But what also sounds very familiar to Prof.
Sapogin, is Prof. Meyl's neutrino- and vortex
theories.
Photo: Shad discussing with Prof. Konstantin
Meyl.
Shortly ago one venture capitalist draw my attention
on my style of writing, I should learn to write in a
way easily understandable for anyone. Scientific texts
anyway a hard to understand, and people often do not
often have patience to read and understand. Personally
also I think the truth can be much more simple than we
think and as it is presented to us by established
science.
Prof. Sapogin wrote in his document:
> I know about experimental research of Professor Kanarev
and it is very interesting.
> BUT, ANY THEORETICAL EXPLANATION BASED IN ORDINARY
> SCIENCES IS WRONG. Ordinary science have base conservation
> laws and if you correctly use conventional theory you can obtaine conservation law
> only and explanation of Testatika
machine is impossible, if you use ordinary science.
Many professors try to describe such things with terms
from ordinary science, being afraid for their
reputation, as many others before lost their
credibility, as they have 'turned away' from
established science.
But I must agree with Prof. Sapogin, because ordinary
science is made more or less of half-truth. For me the
half truth is worse than a lie – because the lie
easily can be recognized, but hardly can be a half truth.
Electromagnetic Fields
In Experimenting
Ighina's Atom is a
Cosmic Energy Windmill
In fact every atom or molecule is a sender and a
receiver simultaneously, as well as a converter of
cosmic radiation. The cosmic radiation it converts
keeps the atom in motion so to the external it looks
like perpetual motion, a self maintainer.
There are basic laws how atoms perform this, which
were nicely described by an Italian physicist, who
unfortunately was not recognized by established
science, although he was a co-worker of Mr. Marconi.
His name is Pier Luigi Ighina, he passed away last
winter.
Ighina observed these basic laws under his microscope,
which he divided into four points:
1) The light atoms, when they excite the observed
atoms, give part of their motion to the latter
2) The observed atoms absorb part of the motion of the
light atoms to speed up theirs
3) In order to excite an atom, you need it to get in
touch with an atom of higher motion; the atom with the
highest motion will attract the one with the lowest
motion
4) The higher the atoms motion, the more luminous it
will be and viceversa
(From The Magnetic Atom Pier Luigi Ighina,
more at http://www.svpvril.com/ighina/magatom.html
)
It seems to me that when this dielectric energy from
space converts in our conductive matter a temporary
product is generated, which later can be polarized to
south or north, or plus and minus. An energy which
contains of dipoles. And if we trigger the atoms of a
conductor with those two dipoles, electricity will
result. The diffusion process hence depends very much
on the conductivity, chemical composition and symmetry
of the matter it is converted in.
The air in our atmosphere must be filled with these
dipoles, which result from this diffusion process.
In the case of the Testatika this diffusion process
performs very rapidly whereby only high voltage and
static electricity develops. Would the Testatika be
made of other materials, where the process would run
slower, there would result lower voltage and higher
amperages.
I am even that crazy that I dare to claim that the
permanent magnets in reality have no permanent
magnetism, but tap their energy from the ambient with
their two dipoles, and that their magnetism is caused
by electro-magnetic spin in the material of the
magnets.
If they lost their resonant frequency to the ambient
energy, their would also lose their permanent
magnetism. To the external it seems they are permanent
magnets, but maybe this only is an optical delusion,
as we cannot measure the energy.
Tesla's Energy Sink
Tesla
had an idea on how one could make an 'energy
sink', which description I pasted below:
*** In order to tap this energy storehouse Tesla had
to accomplish two things - make a "cold sink" in the
ambient energy and devise a way of making the "sink"
self-pumping. Explaining how this process might have
worked requires, again, speculation.
Such a "sink" would have to be at a lower energy state
than the surrounding medium and, for the energy to
continually flow into it, the "sink" would have to
maintain the lower energy state while meeting the
power requirements of the load attached to it.
Electrical energy, watt-seconds, is a product of volts
x amps x seconds. Because the period of oscillation
does not change, either voltage or current has to be
the variable in the coil's energy equation. ***
Imagine now you have two electrodes from two different
materials and proper symmetry, which will not allow
that the field lines might close (broken symmetry).
Between the electrodes put a material with a high
energy field and high frequency. This would allow you
that the electrodes will be charged as in a capacitor.
If now you tap the charge from the electrodes, they
again will tap energy from the field between the
electrodes which oscillate in higher frequencies and
has a energy field, than the electrodes. Then you had
an energy sink as Tesla describes it.
There are materials which can be programmed, so they
can maintain their oscillation. Organic living matter
is supposed to have a higher energy field than
an-organic materials do. But also different gases,
plasma and other are very sensitive, if they are
triggered with the right impulses. If we found the
right material with the right conductivity and
permeability and the right symmetry, we could convert
greater amounts of anti-matter without bigger losses
and utilize as electricity.
I am convinced this is possible, because also to me
with my limited understanding and materials I am
mainly able to realize what I am speaking about.
These are my basic thought I wanted to share with you,
but I guess professors like Mr. Kanarev or Aspden can
explain this theory much more professionally – I am
rather an experimental physicist, trying to learn from
them.
Best regards,
Shad
=====
Save Mother Earth and you'll save yourselves!
http://shad.de.vu
February 16, 2004
About Explaining Testatika
by 'Kanarev effect'
Hello Juha and everybody,
I am enthused by these explanations and descriptions
and fully agree with you!
I made similar experiences in my magnetic resonance
electrolysis as Prof. Kanarev explains it in his
low-current electrolysis. His theory is a
jewel in
today's physics and I hope he will further enlighten
us with his realizations.
In my realization atoms all are converter of
anti-matter (neutrinos, zpe, aether, tachyon, etc),
the cosmic radiation our matter absorbs and converts.
Our matter oscillates and in this way communicates
with this cosmic radiation, absorbs it whereby a
diffusion process results and many energy are being
produce, such as light, heat, magnetism, gravity and
others. I think that also gravity depends on this
radiation, as Prof. Kanarev describes it in his
theory.
It seems that gravity is present twice, once on the
molecular level, where it holds matter in 'one piece',
and on the other there is the gravity as it is
familiar to us, which our planet generates.
Experiments show that gases and fluids are very
sensitive with those energies, and that this cosmic
radiation slows them down in their velocity whereby a
diffusion process might occur, which again might
generate mechanical energy.
The Testatika as you just described it, also generates
some plasma or high voltage spark, which has the
property of absorbing this cosmic energy to transform
it in this way.
All matter absorbs it, but under specific conditions,
like the right impulsive frequency, conductivity and
symmetry of a medium matter is able to convert more of
this cosmic radiation.
Avalanche of Electrons -
Electrolysis Goes On
Without Current
In my electrolysis system for example I
observe that
under specific conditions and at specific frequencies
and avalanche effect of electrons result, which works
on even after the electrolysis unit was switched off.
I made one experiment in this manner and observed that
the avalanche effect went of for weeks, where the
water was further decomposed, which actually is a kind
of JoeX or Joe cell effect.
In think if one could trigger the atoms with a proper
frequency and impulse, they will convert more energy
as if they would do under 'normal circumstances'.
In water for example the molecular bonds cannot be
maintained if such conversion of these bigger amounts
of energy occurs.
Actually happens what Prof. Kanarev describes in his
theory, where he says that atoms replace their lost
energy from vacuum (the 'Kanarev Effect',
http://Kanarev.energy.innoplaza.net ).
To me it looks like the greatest problem is to
properly convert aether (cosmic radiation). To tap
cosmic energy is more or less easy, but in the
conversion process itself a lot of energy is lost.
Here is the quest, where we have to find a solution.
This is my humble opinion and sight on this subject
matter.
Prof. Kanarev makes revolutionary pioneer work by
publishing the theory and thoughts in his books,
helping to us to understand this kind of subject
matter and the physics behind all this!
Kind regard,
Shad
Shad's 'Fuelcracker'
demonstration making
cleanly burning gas from
ordinary petrochemical liquid
fuels was one of the audience
magnets of the Binnotec Berlin
energy conference
in 2002.
Seeing The Obvious 